News
Action postponed on job protections
Measure to roll back Clinton order will shift to different bill
by Lou Chibarro, Jr., The Washington Blade
July 17, 1998
US Rep. Joel Hefley (R-CO) agreed Wednesday, July 15, to postpone
plans to introduce an anti-gay amendment to an appropriations bill this
week after several of his Republican colleagues told him that doing so
would be a personal "affront" to openly gay Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-AZ).
According to knowledgeable sources on Capitol Hill, Republican
House members reminded Hefley that Kolbe, as chair of the House
Appropriations Subcommittee on Treasury, Postal Service, and General
Government would be the floor manager of the bill to which Hefley planned
to attach his amendment.
"They told him it would put them in an awkward position," said one
GOP staffer. Hefley's amendment seeks to overturn President Clinton's May
28th executive order banning job discrimination against civilian gay federal
employees. Hefley, saying he never intended to insult Kolbe, told House GOP
leaders he now plans to introduce his amendment to another appropriations
bill scheduled to reach the House floor next week. He first announced plans
to introduce his amendment in a "Dear Colleague" letter three weeks ago.
Kolbe stated one week later that he strongly opposes Hefley's
amendment. Kolbe vowed to fight the amendment if Hefley tried to attach it
to the fiscal year 1999 US Postal Service-Department of Treasury
appropriations bill. The House was debating that bill as the Blade went to
press yesterday.
Staff members to both Republican and Democratic House members
agreed to discuss the behind-the-scenes talks that led to Hefley's
temporary withdrawal of his amendment on the condition that they not be
identified. Republican staffers said rank-and-file GOP House members joined
forces with House Republican leaders – including House Speaker Newt
Gingrich (R-GA) – in persuading Hefley that introducing his amendment to a
bill closely tied to Kolbe would put Kolbe's colleagues in an uncomfortable
situation.
Kolbe, a 13-year House veteran and a staunch fiscal conservative,
is well liked by his Republican colleagues. At least some Republicans would
likely vote against a Hefley amendment linked to the Postal-Treasury bill
out of respect for Kolbe, even though they support it in principle,
according to at least two House GOP staffers.
Leigh LaMora, Hefley's press secretary, told the Blade that
respect for Kolbe was among the factors that prompted Hefley to back of on
his amendment this week. But LaMora said a key factor leading to the
postponement was also Hefley's decision to rewrite his amendment to broaden
its scope to cover all federal workers, not just executive branch workers.
LaMora said that attaching the amendment to the Postal-Treasury
appropriations bill would have limited its coverage to just executive
branch workers.
She said Hefley plans to introduce his amendment to an
appropriations bill that funds the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and
State as well as the federal court system and more than a dozen other
federal agencies. The House is expected to begin deliberations on that bill
late next week. "We get a lot more out of it by going with the
Commerce-Justice bill," LaMora said.
Ironically, Kolbe serves as the second-ranking Republican member of
the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State, the
Judiciary, and Related Federal Agencies, which is in charge of the bill to
which Hefley now plans to attach his amendment. Rep. Harold Rogers (R-KY),
the chair of that subcommittee, has worked closely with Kolbe in preparing
the Commerce-Justice appropriations bill.
Meanwhile, knowledgeable House Democratic staffers, while agreeing
that some Republicans viewed the Hefley amendment as an insult Kolbe, said
the real reason GOP leaders wanted Hefley to call off the amendment this
week was to avoid the embarrassment of having Kolbe, a well-respected
subcommittee chair opposing an amendment backed by GOP leaders. Among those
who have signed on as a supporter of the Hefley amendment is Rep. Tom DeLay
(R-TX), the House Majority Whip.
"It was becoming a public relations nightmare for them," said a
high-level Democratic staffer.
Hefley's decision this week to postpone offering his amendment came
two weeks after gay civil rights groups began a national lobbying campaign
to oppose the Hefley amendment. Among the Washington, DC-based groups
opposing the amendment are Log Cabin Republicans, a national gay Republican
group, and the National Gay and Lesbian Taks Force.
Rich Tafel, Log Cabin's executive director, said he believes
Hefley's motive for withholding his amendment this week had more to do with
his determination that he lacked the votes to pass it rather than a desire
to be respectful to Kolbe.
"It was an insult to Kolbe to propose this in the first place,"
said Tafel.
Tafel said he and other Log Cabin officials were contacting each of
the 74 House Republicans who have adopted hiring policies of
non-discrimination based on sexual orientation for their own congressional
staffs. Tafel said Log Cabin is urging these House members to oppose the
Hefley amendment, telling them that the Hefley amendment telling them that
the Clinton executive order gives federal workers merely the same job
protections that these House members have already given the employees in
their own offices.
The Clinton order, known as Executive Order 13087, added the term
"sexual orientation" to an existing executive order that bars
discrimination against federal civilian workers on grounds of race, color,
religion, sex, national origin, disabiities, and age. Federal personnel
experts note that the Clinton order strengthens job protections for gay
federal workers that were put in effect years earlier as a result of court
rulings and civil service policies.
Republican President Gerald Ford became the first president to
formalize court rulings banning anti-gay discrimination against federal
civilian workers through a 1975 policy change in the then US Civil
Service Commission.
Hefley's amendment, as written two weeks ago, called for
overturning the Clinton order by prohibiting the expenditure of any funds
to "implement, administer, or enforce" the order. Members of the House have
disclosed whether or not they have office policies banning anti-gay
employment discrimination in response to a questionnaire the Human Rights
Campaign sends routinely to each member of Congress. According to HRC, 74
House Republicans (32 percent of all House Republicans) disclosed that they
have such a policy.